Dr. William Barrett

Interpretation of “stiffness” post knee replacement surgery

Study presented at the 2013 Knee Society meeting in Chicago, IL, on March 23, 2013 analyzed residual stiffness at 6 months following knee replacement. The authors surveyed patients both preoperatively and at 6 months. They also surveyed the surgeons and recorded the expectations of the patient and the surgeon preoperatively. There were 246 patients studied in this survey. At 6 months, the perceived stiffness above what the patients expected was 40%. The impression of the surgeon at 6 months was often quite different from that of the patient. Of note, many patients complained of stiffness despite the fact that they also reported that they could bend and straighten their knee fully. This points to the fact that residual swelling and inflammation at 6 months can be interpreted by the patient as stiffness while the surgeon notes very good range of motion on the part of the patient. This underscores the need of patients and surgeons to talk honestly about the results after knee replacement. We as surgeons often equate full range of motion, i.e. 0 to 120+ degrees as a very good result while the patient may interpret that range of motion as satisfactory, but the knee still feels swollen and “stiff.” It generally takes up to 12+ months for the inflammation and swelling from the knee replacement to fully resolve and motion will continue to improve even after the 12-month followup.

—William P. Barrett, MD

Posted in Knee Replacement, Knee Replacement (Partial), Recovery & post surgery, Uncategorized | Leave a comment
Dr. William Barrett

Decreasing the Risk of Infection Following Joint Replacement Surgery

At the 2013 American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons annual meeting in Chicago, IL, March 19 through 23, 2013, there were several papers evaluating ways to decrease infection following joint replacement surgery. These can be lumped into things that the patient can do preoperatively to minimize the risk as well as things surgeons can do intraoperatively and postoperative.

We have taken many of the “best practices” information and tried to educate our patients as to ways they can maximize the outcome after their surgery. Certainly taking an inventory of your skin prior to a joint replacement surgery is important to make sure there are no significant skin lesions or superficial infections. If you have any dental problems, these should be addressed well before surgery so there is no contamination from an oral infection. If you have extra pounds leading to folds around your waist, it is important to make sure that these are clean and free of any type of fungal infection, which can manifest itself as redness in these folds.

The day before surgery, many surgeons will have their patient’s cleanse their body with some type of antiseptic soap, washing the area of surgery and the surrounding extremity and the remainder of the body. The morning of surgery, further cleansing of the skin with chlorhexidine wipes can be helpful to decrease the bacterial load prior to surgery. Nasal swabs with dilute Betadine can also be effective in decreasing nasal bacteria. Use of dedicated operating rooms for joint replacement, efficient use of surgical time and careful soft tissue treatment will all help decrease the risk of infection.

Decreasing postoperative blood loss and using appropriate surgical dressings can also help minimize the risk. While the risk can be decreased, the risk of infection cannot be driven to 0 because of multiple factors including the patient’s overall health and their immune system. We try to do everything we can to minimize that risk and patients trying to optimize their health and wellbeing prior to surgery can also help ensure the best possible outcome.

—William P. Barrett, MD

Posted in Hip Replacement, Knee Replacement, Knee Replacement (Partial), Recovery & post surgery, Surgery outcomes & quality, Uncategorized | Leave a comment
Dr. William Barrett

What Can You Expect After Total Knee Replacement

At the 2013 Knee Society meeting in Chicago, Illinois, March 23, 2013, several papers were presented, detailing factors affecting recovery from knee replacement.  A multicenter study presented by Dr. J. Parvizi, et al, looked at data from 661 patients with an average age of 54 years old, 61% of which were female.  They analyzed them at 1 to 3 years after a knee replacement.  They used a third-party independent survey team to eliminate observer bias in the data collection.  What they found is that overall there was a high degree of satisfaction with regard to pain relief and function after knee replacement in the range of 85% to 90% of patients.  Sixty-six percent of the patients felt their knee felt “normal.”  One-third of patients experienced some residual pain, one-third of patients felt there was some residual stiffness, and 50% of patients noted some difficulty “going up and down stairs.”  Fifty percent of patients felt they had some residual limp.  In another study by the same group of physicians questioning the same group of patients regarding their return to work, they found that patients who were working the 3 months prior to their knee replacements had a high percentage of return to work.  Over 95% of patients returned to work after surgery including work that was characterized as both heavy and moderately heavy duty.  The time off work varied depending on the physical demands of the job.

—William P. Barrett, MD

Posted in Knee Replacement, Knee Replacement (Partial), Surgery outcomes & quality, Uncategorized | Leave a comment
Dr. William Barrett

Followup metal-on-metal hip replacement

At the 41st Annual Open Hip Society meeting in Chicago, Illinois 03/23/2013, several papers were presented on the evolving recommendations for patients with metal-on-metal hip replacement. Because of concerns about adverse tissue reaction due to wear products of metal-on-metal hips, the orthopedic community worldwide has been intently evaluating best practices for follow up of these patients. As it turns out there are several potential sources of metal wear debris including articulation between a metal ball and metal socket, corrosion between the metal ball and the stem, and or modular junctions between the metal neck and stem. All of these seem to contribute to the potential problem.

We have had modular junctions in hip replacement components for several decades, but the widespread use of metal-on-metal total hip replacements, which exceeds 1 million patients worldwide, has brought to the forefront some of the potential downsides of these articulations. There appear to be both mechanical problems, as well as chemical reactions that lead to the release of metal byproducts and ions. Currently, patients who have metal-on-metal hip replacements are recommended to see their orthopedic surgeon annually for a history, exam, and x-ray. If patients are having pain then it is recommended blood or serum cobalt and chromium levels be evaluated. If these are extremely low and the patient’s symptoms are otherwise minimal, continued followup is recommended. If patients are having significant pain and a limp or other mechanical factors then a special MARS MRI scan of the hip is recommended looking for fluid collection and/or significant soft tissue changes.

There are several factors that influence patient’s susceptibility to metal-on-metal wear debris and these include the patient themselves and their immune system, the particular implant utilized, and the surgical technique and implant positioning. All of these play a factor. It was concluded by experts worldwide that follow up is essential as recommendations keep evolving over the last 18 months.

—William P. Barrett, MD

Posted in Hip Replacement, Joint implants, Surgery outcomes & quality, Uncategorized | Leave a comment
Dr. William Barrett

Direct Anterior Approach for Hip Replacement

The popularity of direct anterior approach for hip replacement surgery is increasing as evidenced by the number of courses offered by orthopedic manufacturers and articles published in orthopedic journals.  We recently had our article comparing direct anterior approach total hip to mini-posterior approach total hip accepted for publication in The Journal of Arthroplasty.  Based on our study, we have found that patients have less postoperative pain, recover more quickly, and are able to return to activity without restriction sooner using the direct anterior approach.  When controlling for other variables, the different surgical approach seems to be the variable that is most significant in the above mentioned items.  The anterior approach also allows interoperative adjustment of implant positioning, leading to more accurate placement of the socket and stem in hip replacement.  This hopefully will have a positive long-term benefit decreasing wear of the implants due to proper mating of the bearing surfaces.  We will continue to follow our patients in the above mentioned study out to 5 years to ensure that mid term followup reinforces the early positive results of the direct anterior approach.

—William P. Barrett, MD

Posted in Hip Replacement, Recovery & post surgery, Surgery outcomes & quality, Surgical procedures or techniques | Leave a comment
Dr. William Barrett

Anesthesia for Joint Replacement

Dr. Pugely and coauthors from the University of Iowa published an article in the February edition of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery comparing spinal anesthesia to general anesthetic for total knee arthroplasty. They found that patients who underwent a spinal anesthetic had fewer complications, including lower rate of wound infection, blood transfusion, length of stay, and confusion postoperatively. This data supports our belief that use of regional anesthetic such as a spinal in association with a femoral nerve block provides more rapid recovery with lower risk of complications for our total knee patients. Patients are sedated during the operation with a short-acting medication that reverses as soon as the medication is stopped. The combination of this type of anesthesia plus multimodal pain management decreases the pain experienced by patients after hip and knee replacement and allows individuals to get up and around on the day of surgery. By improving the patient experience, which includes postoperative pain management, we have made total joint replacement a more enjoyable experience, which gets the patient back on their feet and returning to activities.

—William P. Barrett, MD

Posted in Knee Replacement, Recovery & post surgery, Surgery outcomes & quality | Leave a comment
Dr. William Barrett

How Do I Know When It Is Time For Joint Replacement Surgery?

Many people suffer from some form of arthritis of the hip or knee.  In fact, it has been estimated that 1 in 5 patients have some form of arthritis affecting their mobility.  It is one of the most costly conditions that we as healthcare providers deal with.  So if you have pain that is present on a regular basis, pain that interferes with your sleep, requires anti-inflammatory medication, and limits everyday activities, you may well be suffering from osteoarthritis that is serious enough to consider joint replacement surgery.  After seeking an evaluation with an orthopedic surgeon, who will listen to your history, examine your extremities, and obtain an x-ray, discussions will ensue as to the appropriate treatment of your hip or knee condition.  As osteoarthritis is a progressive disorder, it will not cease hurting as time goes on.  The rate at which the condition progresses is highly variable and different from patient to patient.  In general, for early and moderate arthritis symptomatic treatment in the form of weight loss, strengthening exercises, oral anti-inflammatory medications, and occasionally injectable medications into the affected joint can be very effective.  With time as the arthritis progresses, the efficacy of these treatment modalities will decrease and patients will reach the conclusion that something needs to be done.  There are many variables that will lead ultimately for a patient to decide on having joint replacement surgery, but the most important seem to be increasing pain, decreasing function, and a quality of life that is suffering as a result of the above.  Once these become clear, the decision to proceed is made by the patient in consultation with their surgeon.  The most effective treatments prior to surgery include those that are most easily made by the patient in the form of improving their overall health, decreasing their weight and improving their strength to get the most out of their compromised joint.

—William P. Barrett, MD

Posted in Arthritis, Hip Replacement, Knee Replacement, Osteoarthritis, Pain management, Uncategorized | Leave a comment
Dr. William Barrett

Decision making for joint replacement

Patients present with a variety of symptoms and severity of arthritis of the hip and knee. The goal of management of an arthritic hip and knee is to maintain your own joint as long as it is able to provide reasonable function without significant pain. Therefore, initial treatment for mild to moderate arthritis always involves things you can do as a patient, such as weight reduction, low impact exercise and strengthening to improve not only your overall health, but the muscles around the affected joint. Use of over-the-counter anti-inflammatory medications such as ibuprofen or Naprosyn can be useful as well as pain relievers such as Tylenol. As arthritic involvement of the hip or knee becomes more moderate to severe, prescription anti-inflammatory medications can be utilized and shots of either cortisone or lubricant type materials such as Synvisc can be considered. Once arthritis becomes more severe, consideration of surgery to treat the arthritic joint can be discussed. The indications for some form of joint replacement include increasing pain, decreasing function and the negative affects of these on your quality of life. If you have failed nonoperative treatment measures and x-rays reveal significant loss of joint space consistent with progressive osteoarthritis, then discussion with an orthopedic surgeon over the options for treatment is appropriate. This process should be a shared decision-making relationship where you as a patient gather as much information as you can from your interaction with your doctors, as well as what is available in a variety of Internet websites. In this way you can educate yourself about the options available and have a discussion with your surgeon about which particular option make sense for you.

With regard to arthritic knees, there is the option in younger individuals for an osteotomy to shift the weight from the more involved side to a less involved side of the knee. Once the joint has lost all of its cartilage, some form of replacement is typically preferred. This includes a partial knee replacement which is utilized in roughly 10% of patients, or more commonly a complete knee replacement that resurfaces all 3 parts of the knee. The preoperative evaluation, the hospital course, and the recovery will be discussed prior to surgery. You should make sure you have all of your questions answered and understand the procedure, the expected outcome, and risks.

With regard to hip replacement, once the joint space has been lost and severe arthritis is noted, then total hip replacement is the procedure of choice. In 2012 the most common bearing surface for hip replacement is a polyethylene liner, with either a metal or ceramic ball. The majority of cases done in the United States at this time involve a cobalt chrome metal ball against a highly crosslink polyethylene liner. The socket that contacts the pelvis is typically made out of titanium and a titanium stem of a variety of designs is typically used inside the thigh bone.

In most cases, patients are in the hospital 1 to 3 days depending on the type of procedure they have. They typically can put all of their weight on the affected limb with the use of ambulatory aids such as a walker or crutches to begin with, progressing to a cane as they feel comfortable.

If you have arthritis involving your hip or knee, the first steps are to do as much as you can to improve your health and function and mitigate the discomfort from the arthritic joint. If your arthritis progresses, educate yourself as much as possible about the treatment options and have a discussion with your physician so that together you can make a shared decision about what is best for you moving forward in the treatment of your arthritic joint.

—William P. Barrett, MD

Posted in Arthritis, Hip Replacement, Joint implants, Joint pain prevention / relief, Knee Replacement, Knee Replacement (Partial), Osteoarthritis, Pain management, Preparation for Surgery | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment
Dr. William Barrett

Variability in outcomes on unicompartmental or partial knee replacement

Stefano Bini, M.D. and coauthors presented the results of a large study of unicompartmental knee replacement performed at the Kaiser Hospital System at the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons in Dallas, Texas, in November 2012. They reviewed all cemented partial knee replacements performed between 2001 and 2009, which included a group of 1, 746 partial knee replacements. The revision rate at almost 8 years followup was approximately 5%. They found that several factors were important in predicting failure. These included the patient less than 55 years of age, the individual who had more medical comorbidities and certain implant designs perform better than others. They also found that surgeons that perform fewer than 12 partial knee replacement per year had a higher failure rate than those who performed 12 or more partial knee replacements per year. As in all surgical cases there are multiple variables that affect outcome and again this study emphasizes the importance of surgeon experience and health of the patient in predicting outcomes of partial knee replacement.

William P. Barrett, MD

Posted in Knee Replacement, Knee Replacement (Partial), Surgery outcomes & quality | Leave a comment
Dr. William Barrett

Use of hyaluronic acid injections for osteoarthritis of the knee

There have been multiple studies in the recent orthopedic literature evaluating the effectiveness of hyaluronic acid in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis of the knee. While studies that have had industry sponsorship have typically had a more favorable outcome, other studies without industry funding have concluded that hyaluronic acid is no more effective than either cortisone or placebo. Because of the conflicting data, most orthopedic surgeons will attempt to use an intraarticular cortisone injection first to see if they can gain an adequate response with decreased inflammation and pain. If oral anti-inflammatories and intraarticular cortisone injections fail, then in patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis hyaluronic acid is certainly a viable option with the realization there is a substantial increased cost associated with the use of this drug, therefore a less expensive option should be tried first.

—William P. Barrett, MD

Posted in Joint pain prevention / relief, Osteoarthritis | Leave a comment